The West remains unconcerned about Belgrade’s complaints on Kosovo because of Serbia’s stated goal of joining the European Union. As long as Serbia seeks EU membership, its continued indignation on the matter will have no real repercussions and will be something the West can continue to ignore.
Preporuke:
0
0
2
petak, 23 jul 2010 20:56
Zaludan
Da kojim slucajem ne zivim u Srbiji, razmisljajuci iskljucivo u uskim i apstraktnim okvirima onog ko je sastavljao ovu analizu, jasno polazeci od najprirodnijih instinkata jedne nacije i njene drzave u pogledu opstanka, rekao bi da je ovo jedna sasvim realisticna prognoza. Ali ovako, kao pripadnik nacije cije se radikalizovano i zaostreno ponasanje toboze predvidja, dozivljavam je kao neosnovano i sasvim neopravdano laskavu. Srbi su u protekloj dekadi isuvise ekonomski razvijani, politicki, vojno i bezbednosno reformisani, svoju su mladost previse lako prepustali na vaspitanje, skolovanje i staranje svojim najgorim neprijateljima, da bi posle svega bili u stanju za jednu tako normalnu i zdravu reakciju. Prema tome mirno spavaj svete, Srbija kao izvor tenzija i nestabilnosti moze iskljucivo da bude jos samo prema samoj sebi. Miroljubivije od toga se zaista ne moze.
Preporuke:
0
0
3
petak, 23 jul 2010 22:33
Bojan
Rijetko iskren komentar sa zapadne strane. Za razliku od brojnih medija, uključujući i ruske, ovi nisu pali na zamku i jasno su ocjenili šta je to u stvari sud odlučio.
Dakle iz ovog se vidi sledeće:
- promjena pro-EU orjentacije u Srbiji i ulazak u realističnu (realpolitik) fazu
- istrošenost sadašnje vlasti, pristupa svemu itd
- obogaćivanje palete sredstava kojima se odgovara na kosovsku "nezavisnost"
- dolazeće etničko čišćenje Srba na sjeveru Kosmeta na koje Beograd vjerovatno neće imati spreman odgovor
Preporuke:
0
0
4
subota, 24 jul 2010 00:33
Hazarski recnik
Srbija 2020-tih kao pojam vise nece ni postojati tako da tada EU nece morati ni da mari sta da radi sa ovim delom sveta. Ovo je potpuno unistenje identiteta jedne nacije. Od 1989 smo u fokusu Americke bizarne laboratorije: "Kako i sta sve je moguce uciniti jednoj naciji"
Ocigledno je da njihovi eksperimenti nemaju kraja, jer im bas geopoliticki odgovaramo za to - kao kec na jedanaest, u vakuumu bez adekvatnih saveznika vec 30 godina a i nadalje. Posle nas primenjuju iste ili modifikovane metode po svetu tamo gde im je u stvari to realno strateski i bitno.
Znaci Srpska nacija nakon jos 15 godina terorisanja zavrsava na smetlistu: "bili neki ljudi nekad na Balkanu?", a na nasem mestu bice ovi Americki "Bosnjaci", "Kosovari" i kakvi jos sve ne.
Preporuke:
0
0
5
subota, 24 jul 2010 03:42
Bojan
Zbog čega ne možemo da vjerujemo tim "Evropljanima"? Evo par citata iz neslaganja sudije Tomke str 7/8:
The United Kingdom condemned
“unilateral statements on Kosovo’s final status from either side. We will not recognize any move to establish political arrangements for the whole or part of Kosovo, either unilaterally or in any arrangement that does not have the backing of the international community.” (S/PV.4742, p. 16, United Kingdom.)
A few months later, the same government stated in the Security Council that “nilateral statements on status by any side seem to the United Kingdom to be totally unacceptable” (S/PV.5017, p. 21). The French government stated in 2003 that “[n]o progress can be achieved in Kosovo on the basis of unilateral action that is contrary to resolution 1244 (1999) or that flouts the authority of UNMIK and KFOR” (S/PV.4770, p. 5). The German Permanent Representative was unequivocal when he stated in 2003:
“The question of Kosovo’s final status will be addressed at the appropriate time and through the appropriate process. Only the Security Council has the power to assess the implementation of resolution 1244 (1999), and it has the final word in settling the status issue. No unilateral move or arrangement intended to predetermine Kosovo’s status ⎯ either for the whole or for parts of Kosovo ⎯ can be accepted.” (S/PV.4770, pp. 13-14; emphasis added.)
A few weeks later, the same government expressed its view that “[c]oncerning the future status of Kosovo, the parties have to understand that no unilateral act can change the status of Kosovo as laid down in Security Council resolution 1244 (1999)” (S/PV.4809).
Preporuke:
0
0
6
subota, 24 jul 2010 10:42
Pera
Stratfor-ov analiticar je lepo izrekao uzrok propasti srpske diplomatske inicijative, a N.B. ga je podvukao...
.jpg)
Dakle iz ovog se vidi sledeće:
- promjena pro-EU orjentacije u Srbiji i ulazak u realističnu (realpolitik) fazu
- istrošenost sadašnje vlasti, pristupa svemu itd
- obogaćivanje palete sredstava kojima se odgovara na kosovsku "nezavisnost"
- dolazeće etničko čišćenje Srba na sjeveru Kosmeta na koje Beograd vjerovatno neće imati spreman odgovor
Ocigledno je da njihovi eksperimenti nemaju kraja, jer im bas geopoliticki odgovaramo za to - kao kec na jedanaest, u vakuumu bez adekvatnih saveznika vec 30 godina a i nadalje. Posle nas primenjuju iste ili modifikovane metode po svetu tamo gde im je u stvari to realno strateski i bitno.
Znaci Srpska nacija nakon jos 15 godina terorisanja zavrsava na smetlistu: "bili neki ljudi nekad na Balkanu?", a na nasem mestu bice ovi Americki "Bosnjaci", "Kosovari" i kakvi jos sve ne.
The United Kingdom condemned
“unilateral statements on Kosovo’s final status from either side. We will not recognize any move to establish political arrangements for the whole or part of Kosovo, either unilaterally or in any arrangement that does not have the backing of the international community.” (S/PV.4742, p. 16, United Kingdom.)
A few months later, the same government stated in the Security Council that “nilateral statements on status by any side seem to the United Kingdom to be totally unacceptable” (S/PV.5017, p. 21). The French government stated in 2003 that “[n]o progress can be achieved in Kosovo on the basis of unilateral action that is contrary to resolution 1244 (1999) or that flouts the authority of UNMIK and KFOR” (S/PV.4770, p. 5). The German Permanent Representative was unequivocal when he stated in 2003:
“The question of Kosovo’s final status will be addressed at the appropriate time and through the appropriate process. Only the Security Council has the power to assess the implementation of resolution 1244 (1999), and it has the final word in settling the status issue. No unilateral move or arrangement intended to predetermine Kosovo’s status ⎯ either for the whole or for parts of Kosovo ⎯ can be accepted.” (S/PV.4770, pp. 13-14; emphasis added.)
A few weeks later, the same government expressed its view that “[c]oncerning the future status of Kosovo, the parties have to understand that no unilateral act can change the status of Kosovo as laid down in Security Council resolution 1244 (1999)” (S/PV.4809).